the_wanlorn: Words Can Change the World (Words Change)
The Wanlorn ([personal profile] the_wanlorn) wrote2007-01-16 08:17 am

Roald Dahl

 
Gods, I love Roald Dahl. That man is a master of ambiguous characterization.

Let's look at Charlie Bucket, shall we? Charlie was given the chocolate factory because he was a good little pauper, correct? He exhibited princely behaviour and did no wrong and was a little boy that all other children should look up to as a role model, correct?

Ha! Ha ha!

Charlie was just as much of a little shit as the rest of the kids. Remember the fizzy lifting juice? The only difference was that he did not get caught. I think that Wonka even talks about that, arguing with Charlie over whether or not he deserves the prize.

No, Charlie is the Noble Pauper. And, as such, most readers overlook his faults, missing what I think is one of the most interesting and deep (ie, characters with depth as opposed to flat characters) pieces of Dahl's writing: the ambiguity of his main characters.

What of Matilda and Miss Honey? Look at what they did to Trunchbull. Is desire for revenge, motivation to carry out your revenge, and admirable trait? Well, I believe so, but that probably means it isn't. Especially revenge that violent (the doll bit) and that traumatizing (the father bit).

Did Trunchbull deserve it? Of course! That's the point, that she was a Bad Bad Person and gets exactly what she deserves.

But that doesn't make Matilda and Miss Honey good. It also doesn't make them bad.

It makes them morally ambiguous, and that is awesome. That's what makes his books continue to have appeal, even as you grow up and leave your childhood behind.
 

[identity profile] shadowkitty.livejournal.com 2007-01-16 01:42 pm (UTC)(link)
If I remember correctly, neither the fizzy lifting juice, nor the doll were in the books. But Roald Dahl was awesome. Especially Tales of the Unexpected!

[identity profile] the-wanlorn.livejournal.com 2007-01-16 01:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I definitely remember the doll from the books, whereby "doll" I mean "some sort of destruction/vandalism of the house". =P Not sure about the fizzy lifting juice, because I hated the book I only read the book once.

Which would totally suck, because fizzy lifting juice was the coolest part of the movie. =(

[identity profile] caecilia.livejournal.com 2007-01-16 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differences_between_book_and_film_versions_of_Charlie_and_the_Chocolate_Factory

oh wells

[identity profile] the-wanlorn.livejournal.com 2007-01-16 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)
D: I'm so sad now. Also, apparently I have all three versions mixed up in my head. HOW DID THAT HAPPEN?!

[identity profile] jamimegan.livejournal.com 2007-01-16 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I LOVE Roald Dahl. I could not put how much into words.

And you're very correct. Fantastic Mr. Fox was a vicious little thief, too. It worries me, because in today's world where children are being sheltered more and more from everything that could conceivably be a negative influence(my 5-year-old sister isn't allowed to watch classic Disney movies where there's only one parent--it's ridiculous and pisses me off), I can imagine Roald Dahl being thrown by the wayside for mind-numbingly trite crap that wouldn't stimulate an original thought in the world. That would be a travesty.

On a more fun note, I have the original version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory where the Ooompa Loompas are African pygmies!

[identity profile] the-wanlorn.livejournal.com 2007-01-16 07:22 pm (UTC)(link)
sfjkasj;fkjaslfj;als I AM SO JEALOUS!! I looooove having original versions where they're all super-un-PC and stuff, just because.

Yeah, I grew up reading original (read: super-gorey) versions of fairytales and having stuff like Poe as my bedtime stories, and I was horrified when my kindergarten teacher was reading Snow White and there weren't any iron shoes.

[identity profile] princessdot.livejournal.com 2007-01-16 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Hermione, sending Umbridge to the Centaurs. I loved that! And dude, someday I need to make copies of mom's fairytales. YIKES, I don't know which branch of the family she got them from or it's just my overactive imagination [or one influencing the other; you decide which comes first]. Did you grow up askeered of La Llorona? [or the banshee?]

SOMEone's been reading more and more fairytales, hasn't she? =D

[identity profile] the-wanlorn.livejournal.com 2007-01-16 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
La Llorona always terrified me. I don't even remember where I heard about her first, but it's one of the first fairytales that I remember. *shudder*
gaslightgallows: (krispies)

[personal profile] gaslightgallows 2007-01-16 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
While you missed the plotpoint about the fizzy lifting drinks (only in the Gene Wilder version did Charlie steal some, although it's mentioned in the book), you're spot-on about the morally ambiguous nature of Roald Dahl's 'heroes.'

...

Hmm... like another 'hero' I know...

[identity profile] dovyman.livejournal.com 2007-01-17 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
I remember really liking a lot of his books as a kid, but I think the second half of his autobiography (Going Solo) was my favorite, he had an interesting life.